On the quadral axes

To start presenting the quadral axes, I'll first lay some definitions for the Jungian axes:

Logic (T): abstract aspects of a system, how it all fits together
Ethics (F): emotive aspects of human interaction, personal relations
Sensing (S): empirical aspects of present reality, what can be done
Intuition (N): interpretative aspects of non present reality, what could happen

With that being said, I can move on to the definitions:

Coherence (C): making things consistent to facilitate communication

  • Ti: checking the internal consistency of an abstract framework
  • Fe: unifying the mood at a social gathering
  • S-: creating common structures for work
  • N+: creating a common way of understanding the world
Accuracy (A): focusing on particulars to avoid oversimplifying
  • Te: checking how a system would translate into the real world
  • Fi: focusing on personal feelings proper to one person
  • S+: anticipating setbacks to a plan and working around them
  • N-: identifying the limitations of a paradigm
Harmony (H): accepting present conditions to avoid conflict
  • T-: resolving the differences between systems and structures
  • F+: resolving personal conflicts and disagreements
  • Si: tuning the environment to suit personal demands
  • Ne: identifying all potential outcomes and interpretations
Relevance (R): focusing on the most important perspectives in the moment
  • T+: identifying which systems hold the most present potential
  • F-: expressing a particular perspective in an appealing manner
  • Se: exerting influence over the concrete environment
  • Ni: interpreting particular data that holds present importance
Then, it is possible to describe each quadra by combining these elements.

Alpha: Coherence and Harmony, admitting all aspects and integrating them
  • Ti-: checking for how logical inconsistency can be avoided
  • Fe+: creating a welcoming mood for everyone
  • Si-: carefully designing soothing environments
  • Ne+: taking account of all systems in a grand paradigm
Beta: Coherence and Relevance, taking in all aspects to extract the most important
  • Ti+: applying useful rules in the creation of structures
  • Fe-: forming a heavy atmosphere for the transmission of ideas
  • Se-: exerting control over the implementation of projects
  • Ni+: constructing detailed visions with a central idea
Gamma: Accuracy and Relevance, prioritizing particular aspects that hold importance
  • Te+: implementing abstract ideas into innovative projects
  • Fi-: recognizing people with whom there are strong bonds
  • Se+: resisting limiting structures that emphasize trivialities
  • Ni-: isolating those ideas that hold the most promise
Delta: Accuracy and Harmony, appreciating the individuality in each aspect
  • Te-: finding solutions that work for everyone
  • Fi+: relating to people independently of prior bonds
  • Si+: taking precautions against later inconveniences
  • Ne-: envisioning all alternatives and their viability
It is also possible to follow the opposite process and find a new set of sub-elements:

Abstract
  • Ci+: designing complete systems that harbor no contradiction
  • Ae-: prioritizing ideas according to how applicable they are in the moment
  • He-: building new systems from any set of ideas
  • Ri+: synthesizing paradigms that can have a visible impact
External
  • Ci-: building congruent structures in relation to achievable goals
  • Ae+: building workable projects that take account of setbacks
  • Hi-: balancing different demands for specific features in a design
  • Re+: controlling the most important details of a project
Involved
  • Ce-: setting clear rules for group interactions
  • Ai+: working with uncomfortable feelings against social pressures
  • Hi+: mediating personal struggles that hamper well being
  • Re-: dominating the social space in the expression of a perspective
Internal
  • Ce+: expressing a framework that binds everyone together
  • Ai-: identifying where frameworks fail to encompass personal feelings
  • He+: finding deep meanings from any individual perspective
  • Ri-: presenting inner visions in an intense manner

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Refining the definitions of Sensing through Model B2

For those who have checked the elemental definitions of Model B2, it is quite apparent that Sensing is considered in terms of how to work and conduct projects. This aspect is notoriously absent, however, in most people's idea of Si. I consider it pertinent, thus, to redefine Si such that it can be best fit into my proposed framework. Si is not about sensory experiences, however pleasant they are, not about psychological comfort in general; or at least, it's not limited to that. To make a good contrast, it is useful to look first into Se, which is identifying the most impactful actions -whether on the social or practical sphere- and how to effect a change in the environment (here I'd like to pause and differentiate this from T+, which recognizes where potential lies, rather than how to enforce the structure in question). Si is unconcerned about making an effect per se, rather, it recognizes personal calls for confort and then satisfies them by recognizing which aspects could...
Read more

Natalie Wynn (IEE): Personality type analysis

Image
The purpose of this typing is to give a better sense of how the individual elements and functions come together in one single sociotype. As most of my previous articles have been focused on the elements, in-depth explanations of how a function works will be provided as the arguments are presented, with an attempt at relating how Model B2 functions are similar to specific Model A functions, as well as their differences. In this case, I will focus on the conflicts between the strong elements of the IEE: N- against N+, as well as F+ against F-. For this, I have selected transgender youtuber Natalie Wynn, host and owner of the channel Contrapoints. 9. Dialoguing F+ Perhaps Wynn is best known for her elaborate costumes and set design, which at first glance suggests the presence of F-, that is, the crafting of a message to be more appealing and shocking, with the purpose of conveying one's inner dispositions towards certain ideas or people. However, that relates to the means of her work,...
Read more

Positivist and negativist pairs

In a previous post, I proposed that positivist elements are expansive, concerned with the production or absorption of a new framework, which is accepted without a further filter, while negativist elements are refining in this regard, seeking to assess existing frameworks according to an external, non universal standard. I'd like to point out that this is not the same as the extroversion/introversion dichotomy, where each side takes respectively similar stances regarding the nature of content that is absorbed, rather than referring to the interpretation and/or management of such content. Now, I will mix both of these dichotomies to discuss the pairs that can be found in either Priority or Dimensionality blocks. SFi is refining as to personal relations, and it is not devoid of personal preferences, primarily when they refer to how comfortable and peaceful interactions will be. It is, however, positivist, and thus uses such interactions to take in what others have to say and deepen th...
Read more