Refining the definition of Te through Model B2
On both the MBTI and Socionics communities, most descriptions of Te are centered on its practical aspect, that of how to make things work, in particular designing optimal plans to maximize efficiency. As I already mentioned in my last post, I view the realm of plan design as falling under the domain of Sensing, that which relates directly to the real, objective world. As such, I believe that, while appropriate in most occasions for the LSE, this approach might turn problematic in understanding LIEs. My proposal for Te is that it checks how well adjusted anything is to the situation, rather than how much logical sense it makes by itself, whether practically (S+) or conceptually (N-). Thus, it always takes a frame of reference in regards to which everything should be judged, thus we might say that, as opposed to Ti, its judgements are situational; universal validity is not a concern when using Te. In a similar manner to the way I adjusted the definition of Si throug the Sensing elements ...